Courtney Kasuboski

contact

650.825.4300 x143

ckasuboski@krameralberti.com

Courtney Kasuboski is an intellectual property litigator with a wide range of technical and courtroom experience.  She practices in District Court, at the International Trade Commission, and at the PTAB, seeking the best possible legal outcomes for clients’ intellectual property disputes.  Her litigation experience has included fact and expert discovery, taking and defending depositions, motions practice, and trial.

With an engineering degree from The Ohio State University, Courtney applies her technical knowledge and acumen to client matters involving automotive, robotic, communication network, video gaming, semiconductor, and power system patents and innovations.

Prior to her legal career, Courtney served as an elementary school teacher with Teach for America in New York, New York.  She remains committed to increasing and enhancing educational opportunities for children.

significant matters
Vaporizer Devices, Cartridges Used Therewith, and Components Thereof; Inv. No. 337-TA-1368 (ITC)  Represented complainant JLI, asserting patents against competitor respondents NJOY and Altria. JLI won an exclusion order on competitor’s products after the ITC found a violation of all four asserted JLI patents.
LKQ Corporation et al v. Kia America, Inc. et al; LKQ Corporation et al v. Hyundai Motor America et al (NDIL) Represented patent holder defendant in a declaratory judgment design patent suit regarding defendant’s headlight and taillight designs.
Certain Integrated Circuits and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-1272 (ITC)  Represented complainant and patent holder MediaTek in an investigation against NXP, obtaining a favorable settlement following trial.
Certain Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules with Nanostructures, and Products Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-1271 (2021) Represented solar manufacturer and respondent Hanwha in an investigation brought by Advanced Silicon Group Technologies. The Commission affirmed the ALJ’s initial determination that Hanwha did not infringe any of the asserted patents.
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. V. Verizon Communications. Inc. et al (EDTX) Defended Verizon from patent infringement while also asserting cross claims of infringement. Obtained mid-trial settlement.
education
Juris Doctor
The Ohio State University, Moritz College of Law, Columbus, OH

Master of Science in Teaching
Fordham University, New York, NY

Bachelor of Science, Industrial and Systems Engineering
The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

admissions
California
Washington, DC
Registered to practice before the USPTO
C.D. California
D. District of Columbia
E.D. Texas
W.D. Texas
venue experience
N.D. California
C.D. California
D. Delaware
E.D. Texas
W.D. Texas
N.D. Illinois
International Trade Commission
United States Patent Office